SOMA across five intelligent-hardware verticals.

How the 125-factor framework applies to each asset class, and the state of the ABF market in practice. Intelligent hardware is physical equipment whose productive value depends not only on the asset itself, but also on software, connectivity, hosted services or data. Maturity varies significantly: some categories are already scaled debt markets; others are emerging or still primarily contract-backed.

Market context updated October 2026.

AI Infrastructure Mature: infrastructure debt

GPU-Backed Compute

How SOMA applies

GPU compute facilities sit at an acute convergence of hardware depreciation (useful-life assumptions run from three to five and a half years), deep software dependency, virtualisation, orchestration, and hyperscaler API lock-in, and capital cycles that can extend well beyond a device's useful life. SOMA's Integration Risk Map scores GPU model generation risk, interconnect obsolescence, and customer concentration in the contract stack, the three factors most likely to impair collateral value mid-facility. The Technical Continuity Score quantifies how much revenue relies on third-party orchestration layers the borrower does not control. The strongest structures in this market now combine asset and contract backing; SOMA's advance rate guidance gives credit committees a scored operational basis for giving credit committees a scored operational basis for that nuance, rather than relying on market-feel LTVs.

Market overview
$125B
AI data-centre and project-financing deals in 2025, up from $15B in the same period of 2024
Reuters, Dec 2025 ↗
$8.5B
CoreWeave financing facility, which CoreWeave described as the first investment-grade-rated GPU-backed financing
Reuters, March 2026 ↗
5 vs 5.5 years
Amazon shortened the reported useful life of a subset of servers and networking equipment from six years to five with effect from 1 January 2025, citing the pace of AI development. With effect from the same date, Meta extended most servers and network assets to 5.5 years.
Amazon.com Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. Form 10-K disclosures
3–4 years
the depreciation schedule banks typically underwrite GPUs over, against Nvidia's contention that top-tier GPUs can earn revenue for up to a decade.
Reuters, "Nvidia's bet that its chips can finance the AI boom gets a Wall Street reality check", 1 October 2026, quoting a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management
Deal examples
CoreWeave
$8.5B DDTL 4.0, rated A3 by Moody's
CoreWeave's $8.5B DDTL 4.0, rated A3 by Moody's and A (low) by DBRS, takes first-priority security over the borrower's tangible and intangible assets including cloud infrastructure, the underlying customer contract and the corresponding data-centre leases. CoreWeave described it as the first investment-grade-rated GPU-backed financing. The collateral package does not stop at the accelerators.
Source: CoreWeave / BusinessWire ↗
Mistral AI
€830M debt, 13,800 Nvidia chips
Reuters reported Mistral raised €830 million of debt to purchase 13,800 Nvidia chips for a Paris-area AI data centre. An example of compute infrastructure debt tied directly to identifiable hardware assets and customer contract revenue.
Source: Reuters ↗
Lambda Labs
$500M ABS via Macquarie
First ABS backed by compute infrastructure, securitising GPU hardware plus rental cash flows from AI cloud customers (mid-2024). Established the ABS template that subsequent GPU lenders have refined.
Source: AIRealist ↗
Nvidia residual-value support
Up to 25% of an opportunity
Residual-value uncertainty is beginning to be addressed explicitly. Nvidia has said it may provide residual-value support for up to 25% of an opportunity on a project-by-project basis, designed to complement rather than replace independent underwriting. Specialist GPU residual-value insurance is also emerging.
Sources: NVIDIA, "NVIDIA AI Factory Compute Is Becoming an Investable Asset Class", August 2026; The Insurer, on GPU residual-value insurance, August 2026
CoreWeave A100 contract
Contract extending into 2029
CoreWeave has disclosed an A100 customer contract extending into 2029, evidence that contracted revenue can extend an accelerator's economic life well beyond its generation.
Source: CoreWeave Inc., Q2 2026 earnings call and related investor presentation
SOMA relevance: The move from simple GPU-collateralised loans to investment-grade asset-and-contract-backed structures is exactly the transition where scored operational assessment adds value. Lenders need to understand software stack lock-in, orchestration dependency, and customer concentration risk, none of which appear on a balance sheet. Vendor residual-value support of the kind Nvidia describes, and the Broadcom guarantee covered under In Focus below, make the same point: where the market cannot price residual value, the manufacturer is asked to.
Automation Emerging: provider fleet debt

Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS)

How SOMA applies

RaaS financing is a real but still emerging debt story, better characterised as provider-fleet equipment finance than a mature ABS market. The collateral case depends on hardware standardisation, redeployability, uptime reliability, maintenance capability, telemetry, customer diversification, and spare-part economics. SOMA's IRM scores the integration risk between edge AI inference software and mechanical hardware, a failure point where a software update that breaks robot calibration directly impairs revenue without any visible financial precursor. The TCS captures software depreciation risk as AI capabilities advance. Advance rate guidance reflects the residual value uncertainty inherent in purpose-built autonomous machinery, which rarely has an established secondary market.

Market overview
$16.7B
market value of global industrial robot installations, a record, per IFR
IFR, 2026 ↗
>$100M
debt capital secured by Formic to fund RaaS equipment purchases, a provider-fleet debt model
Formic ↗
99.3%
uptime across Formic's deployed fleet in 2025, surpassing 500,000 production hours
Formic, 2026 ↗

No publicly rated robot-fleet ABS has been identified to date.

Venture investment in global robotics and physical AI reached $26B in 2025 and had passed $23B by 20 May 2026, overwhelmingly equity. The debt alongside it remains predominantly private: equipment lease lines, vendor finance, and specialist lessors purchasing fleets onto their own balance sheets. Source: PitchBook data reported by The Wall Street Journal, May 2026

Deal examples
Circus SE
Seven-figure asset-backed bond, April 2026
A special purpose vehicle acquired Circus's autonomous kitchen units and leased them back under a long-term arrangement, funding a bond placed through Finexity, alongside a framework for further tranches of up to €50M. Retail-placed and unrated, but structurally a robot-fleet securitisation in miniature.
Source: Circus SE and Finexity AG announcements, 13 April 2026
Picnic
Assignment for the benefit of creditors, 11 May 2026
One customer reported being left with roughly $250,000 of installed but idle equipment; the company's assets and intellectual property were subsequently sold to an undisclosed buyer. Public reporting does not establish which dependency prevented continued operation. The relevant point for a lender is that possession of functioning hardware does not by itself establish continuity of productive use after vendor failure.
Source: GeekWire, May 2026
Formic Technologies
>$100M debt capital
Formic secured access to more than $100M of debt capital to fund equipment purchases for its Robots-as-a-Service model. In 2025, it increased deployments fivefold, surpassed 500,000 production hours, and operated at 99.3% uptime, the operational metrics that underpin its lender case.
Source: Formic ↗
Revenue-based financing (sector pattern)
Subscription receivables structure
In the most advanced RaaS structures, financing companies collect directly from end customers against future subscription receivables, creating a direct link between robot uptime and debt service. The collateral case rests on telemetry, maintenance, and redeployability, not hardware resale value alone.
Source: Ratio Tech ↗
SOMA relevance: Formic's 99.3% uptime is not a marketing claim, it is the operational metric that makes the debt case. SOMA's OTTM provides the post-close monitoring layer that gives lenders visibility into uptime, software currency, and mechanical health without waiting for the borrower's quarterly report.
Mobility Mature: fleet finance Emerging: autonomy-linked

Connected Vehicle Platforms

How SOMA applies

Connected vehicle finance spans two distinct sub-markets that warrant separate treatment. Connected fleets and full-service leasing, where telematics, utilisation data, and servicing contracts are mature, represent the established debt market. Autonomy-linked fleets and robotaxi platforms represent the frontier, where software dependence and milestone risk become structurally more important to lenders. SOMA's IRM assesses OTA update dependency, the degree to which vehicle performance, regulatory compliance, or revenue-generating features depend on software the borrower does not control. The CFS evaluates whether fleet contracts contain technology refresh or software-change provisions that alter the debt service profile mid-term. SOMA's MDRA and OTTM provide dual-dimension monitoring across both hardware and software in a market where a single regulatory software change can impair an entire fleet's operational status.

Market overview
876M
connected vehicles globally in 2025, projected to reach 2.1B by 2035, generating $72B of annual IoT revenue
Transforma Insights ↗
2.3M
combined vehicle fleet if BNP Paribas completes Arval's acquisition of Athlon, creating a European co-leader in full-service leasing
BNP Paribas / Arval press release ↗
$1.25B
Uber investment in Rivian tied to milestones for deploying 10,000 autonomous vehicles from 2028
Reuters, March 2026 ↗
Connected fleets: established market
Arval / BNP Paribas
1.9M fleet + 400K Athlon acquisition
BNP Paribas is pursuing exclusive negotiations to add Athlon's 400,000 vehicles to Arval's existing 1.9 million vehicle fleet, creating a combined full-service leasing entity of close to 2.3 million connected vehicles. Fleet finance at this scale requires telematics-driven asset tracking and servicing that conventional vehicle finance cannot provide alone.
Source: BNP Paribas press release ↗
Autonomy-linked fleets: emerging frontier
Uber / Rivian
Up to $1.25B, milestone-linked
Reuters reported Uber will deploy 10,000 autonomous Rivian vehicles from 2028, with investment of up to $1.25B tied to deployment milestones. A rare example of autonomy-linked fleet finance where the capital structure is explicitly conditioned on software and operational readiness, the SOMA assessment model in practice.
Source: Reuters ↗
Uber, broader AV commitments
>$10B across AV purchases and stakes
Reuters (citing the Financial Times) reported Uber has committed more than $10B across AV-related vehicle purchases and platform stakes. The scale confirms that autonomy-linked fleet finance is no longer a concept, it is a capital deployment category that requires operational due diligence frameworks designed for software-dependent vehicle assets.
Source: Reuters ↗
SOMA relevance: The Uber / Rivian structure is milestone-conditioned on software and operational readiness, which is precisely the assessment SOMA is designed to provide. For autonomy-linked fleet finance, OTA update dependency, regulatory software certification, and uptime telemetry are not secondary considerations; they are the primary credit variables.
Clean Mobility Emerging: selective infrastructure debt

EV Charging Infrastructure

How SOMA applies

EV charging debt is a real and growing market, but selectivity matters: scaled operators with better utilisation, high-quality sites, responsive maintenance, and route-critical locations are more financeable than fragmented early portfolios. SOMA's IRM scores charger-network software integration and CMS reliability, the two operational dimensions most frequently cited in downtime events. The Contract Financeability Score evaluates whether underlying agreements are structured around throughput KPIs that can support debt service in a below-forecast utilisation scenario. SOMA's monitoring triggers capture charger uptime and CMS continuity in near-real time, providing the early warning that quarterly operator reporting cannot.

Market overview
>5M
public charging points globally, more than double the 2022 figure
IEA Global EV Outlook 2025 ↗
$225M
EVgo oversubscribed commercial bank facility, with an option to upsize to $300M
EVgo press release ↗
£300M
committed capex facility for Gridserve, including £45M of UKIB senior debt for ~2,000 ultra-rapid charge points
National Wealth Fund ↗
Deal examples
EVgo
$225M oversubscribed commercial bank facility
EVgo's commercial bank facility was oversubscribed, with an option to increase to $300M. The deal demonstrates institutional debt appetite for scaled CPOs with demonstrable utilisation, the benchmark lenders are now using to separate fundable from non-fundable portfolios.
Source: EVgo press release ↗
Gridserve
£45M UKIB senior debt within £300M facility
The UK Infrastructure Bank (now National Wealth Fund) committed £45M of senior debt within a £300M committed capex facility for approximately 2,000 ultra-rapid charge points. A non-recourse structure, one of the cleaner templates for infrastructure-grade EV charging debt.
Source: National Wealth Fund case study ↗
SOMA relevance: EV charging revenue is generated by charge management software; a CMS outage directly impairs utilisation. Scaled lenders are beginning to demand operational due diligence, uptime history, CMS dependency, maintenance response, that goes beyond what a conventional infrastructure DD checklist provides.
Retail Tech Emerging: small-ticket fleet / equipment finance

Intelligent Vending

How SOMA applies

Intelligent vending is more financeable than it may first appear, especially where telemetry, cashless payments, route density, shrinkage control, and location contracts are strong. Smart vending machines combine proprietary hardware with cloud-connected software (inventory management, dynamic pricing, remote diagnostics) and capital typically structured against machine count and throughput revenue. SOMA's IRM scores the degree to which machine functionality depends on network connectivity and third-party payment processing software, a risk frequently underestimated when a single provider services an entire estate. The MDRA assesses the operator's capacity to service a hardware portfolio at scale, which is the most common operational failure point in vending network roll-outs. The TCS captures software depreciation risk from evolving payment standards.

Market overview
8.1M
connected vending machines globally in 2025, forecast to reach 11.7M by 2030
Berg Insight, 2025 ↗
900K+
connected vending machines each operated by Cantaloupe and Nayax, the two largest connected vending platforms
Berg Insight report ↗
Deal & structure examples
Micromart (connected vending)
Lease-to-own operating model
Micromart offers a lease-to-own model for connected smart vending and unattended retail hardware. Its On Demand Vending case study documents an operator scaling to 24 units and 18 smart stores, with ambitions to reach 50 units, illustrating how small-ticket equipment finance underpins vending network roll-outs.
Source: Micromart case study ↗
Cantaloupe / Nayax (sector benchmark)
900,000+ connected units each
The scale of the two leading connected vending platforms, each with over 900,000 connected machines, illustrates the financing opportunity for connected vending hardware at network scale. Telemetry, payment data, and location contracts are the key underwriting variables.
Source: Berg Insight ↗
SOMA relevance: At 8.1 million connected units globally, intelligent vending is not a niche market. The financing story sits in route-density economics, payment software reliability, and servicing scale, all three of which SOMA's MDRA and IRM are designed to assess for lenders considering fleet-level exposure.

The framework has been applied to battery storage, connected medical devices and drone networks; those assessments are available on request.

What a $35B AI infrastructure deal shows about technology risk in collateral

In June 2026 Apollo and Blackstone closed a $35B debt package financing Google TPUs for Anthropic. A special purpose vehicle buys the chips using debt and equity and leases them to Anthropic, with lease payments servicing the debt. Holding the hardware in the vehicle keeps it off Anthropic's balance sheet.

The collateral is proprietary AI accelerators with no established secondary market, whose resale value depends on whether the software relationship holds and on demand trajectories that are hard to model across a debt term. Broadcom, which co-developed the chips with Google, backs the senior tranches, reported as $6B of A1 notes and $24B of A2, and that guarantee is credited with securing the investment-grade ratings. A separate $4.5B junior tranche priced at 8.5%.

The structure then repeated and grew. By early October, banks were syndicating a $60B package for Anthropic along the same lines: $42B of senior debt carrying Broadcom's guarantee, $18B of junior debt without it. The spread between those two tranches is, in effect, the market pricing technology risk in the collateral.

Most hardware lending does not have that option. The facility is £8M against a fleet of industrial robots, or £12M against a charging network, or £6M against connected vending. The question is the same one: what are these worth under stress, who else can operate them, and what happens if the software relationship ends? There is no manufacturer standing behind the answer. It has to be assessed.

Source: Apollo Global Management, Blackstone and Broadcom announcements and market reporting, June and October 2026.

Assessing a facility in one of these asset classes?

A first conversation covers the specific asset class, the facility structure, and the operational risk questions your credit committee will face. No commitment required.